WCisBroken
Tech Researcher
LEVEL 1
400 XP
In programming world, when one code is written by a programmer, it is then reviewed by another programmer to find any bugs. This practice ensures that the ethical coding standards are used while writing a program and there is nothing wrong with the end product. However, many programmers find it difficult to review codes and that is because, they don’t have any set standards.
We will give you a brief overview about how to review a code properly and what things should be considered.
Functionality
Review programmer should analyze if the software is acting as expected. Can it perform all the task it claims to perform? Can a better algorithm be used to design the same code?
Coding standards
Has the programmer followed the standards set by the organization and the industry? If anything is wrong with code standards, it should be rectified.
Bugs
When a code is written, it can contain a lot of bugs. It may perform certain functions that it was not designed to perform in the first place. Such bugs should be found and killed during review process.
Documentation
Everything in the coding should be self-explanatory. If there is something that cannot be understood, it should be explained by the programmer and if he cannot come with satisfactory explanation, the code should be discarded.
Process
When you are performing a code review for another programmer, make sure that you follow the standards as well.
If you think a code could have been written in a better way, quote an example in front of programmer so he can also learn from your experience. A reviewer should also be able to demonstrate different examples as well.
Make sure you understand the thinking of a programmer. A code is not just a piece of strings and syntaxes but it is actually what the programmer is thinking. Having better understanding about the thinking of programmer will help you review it in a better way too.
We will give you a brief overview about how to review a code properly and what things should be considered.
Functionality
Review programmer should analyze if the software is acting as expected. Can it perform all the task it claims to perform? Can a better algorithm be used to design the same code?
Coding standards
Has the programmer followed the standards set by the organization and the industry? If anything is wrong with code standards, it should be rectified.
Bugs
When a code is written, it can contain a lot of bugs. It may perform certain functions that it was not designed to perform in the first place. Such bugs should be found and killed during review process.
Documentation
Everything in the coding should be self-explanatory. If there is something that cannot be understood, it should be explained by the programmer and if he cannot come with satisfactory explanation, the code should be discarded.
Process
When you are performing a code review for another programmer, make sure that you follow the standards as well.
If you think a code could have been written in a better way, quote an example in front of programmer so he can also learn from your experience. A reviewer should also be able to demonstrate different examples as well.
Make sure you understand the thinking of a programmer. A code is not just a piece of strings and syntaxes but it is actually what the programmer is thinking. Having better understanding about the thinking of programmer will help you review it in a better way too.